|
Post by Chauncey Billups on Feb 12, 2018 2:46:42 GMT
Due to recent events, and past events for that matter, I got to thinking that rotating GMs in and out of the Committee would be for the betterment of the league.
Not sure if this idea has been floated out there before, or even how long most of the current people have been on the Committee, but keeping the same 5 people doesn't make sense.
I don't think having the same 5 people decide the fate of the league is best for anyone.
I propose that every other season, a new GM or two be rotated into the Committee and a GM or two out. The Committee should have term limits.
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Feb 12, 2018 2:49:50 GMT
lmfao
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 24, 2024 7:12:09 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2018 4:23:47 GMT
>.>
<.<
BK4TC
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Feb 12, 2018 10:41:43 GMT
Don't be such a whiner. The tc worked fine before you got here and will work fine long after you're gone
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Feb 12, 2018 12:37:44 GMT
Is it just me or the animosity/intensity is trending upward.
|
|
|
Post by Ghazny Dimalen on Feb 12, 2018 12:43:56 GMT
This is not a bad idea, but only Ian Noble can decide on that.
|
|
|
Post by Chauncey Billups on Feb 12, 2018 21:06:42 GMT
Don't be such a whiner. The tc worked fine before you got here and will work fine long after you're gone Fortunately for you and everybody else, I'm not going anywhere, especially after I bring that Larry O'Brien trophy to Detroit next year. With that being said, I think this is a good idea. I'm not trying to demolish the TC, I'm aware it serves a purpose. I think it would be a good idea to rotate people in and out of the TC so the same 5 people aren't continuously deciding everybody's fate. I think a fair system, with term limits, would do everybody some good.
|
|
|
Post by Chauncey Billups on Feb 15, 2018 23:52:33 GMT
Bump Ian Noble I really think this should be taken seriously. Under normal circumstances I don't think it would be totally crazy to consider bringing in New TC members every so often. Could also get a lot more people involved and more active if they know they have a chance of joining. Could be something similar to how we are now vetting new members before they can take over a team. Maybe those wishing to join the TC could "submit an application" and be active and engaged when new trades are posted.
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Feb 16, 2018 5:10:57 GMT
lol
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Feb 16, 2018 9:27:13 GMT
Bump Ian Noble I really think this should be taken seriously. Under normal circumstances I don't think it would be totally crazy to consider bringing in New TC members every so often. Could also get a lot more people involved and more active if they know they have a chance of joining. Could be something similar to how we are now vetting new members before they can take over a team. Maybe those wishing to join the TC could "submit an application" and be active and engaged when new trades are posted.
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Feb 16, 2018 11:22:16 GMT
I agree some rotation on the Trade Committee would be good, I see the benefits, but for me it's outweighed by the fact that it's not broken and these guys have done a great job over the years, not just on the TC but as player agents, which is by far the bigger and more taxing responsibility.
I can look at the track record of all the guys on Trade Committee, of what they've done with their team, and I can see they've never really made a bad decision for their team. Even if they lost a trade there was always purpose behind their decision making. If I'm going to hire anyone new to the TC I need to see that in their track record, which narrows it down to very few GMs.
Anybody new would also need to understand what this league is about in the long term, and also they need to be a veteran GM who has earned it.
|
|
|
Post by Chauncey Billups on Feb 16, 2018 16:29:26 GMT
I agree some rotation on the Trade Committee would be good, I see the benefits, but for me it's outweighed by the fact that it's not broken and these guys have done a great job over the years, not just on the TC but as player agents, which is by far the bigger and more taxing responsibility. I can look at the track record of all the guys on Trade Committee, of what they've done with their team, and I can see they've never really made a bad decision for their team. Even if they lost a trade there was always purpose behind their decision making. If I'm going to hire anyone new to the TC I need to see that in their track record, which narrows it down to very few GMs. Anybody new would also need to understand what this league is about in the long term, and also they need to be a veteran GM who has earned it. I think that's where the application process would come in. Those who are serious, active and capable of being on the TC would be considered. It's not something that would happen overnight, and possibly not even within this season or next, just eventually. Hell, you could make the application process a season or two long to see how serious the applicants are.
|
|
Chris Mullin
Golden State Warriors
Starter
Posts: 1,303
Feb 19, 2024 21:58:28 GMT
|
Post by Chris Mullin on Feb 16, 2018 17:19:31 GMT
How many GM's here would actually even want to be on the Trade Committee? (except for Billy of course)
I think our TC members do a great job. Sure, there are times when I might not necessarily agree with something but that is inevitable in a league like this. If it aint broke don't fix it, and I don't feel like it's broke.
Just my 2 cents
|
|
|
Post by Chauncey Billups on Feb 16, 2018 20:16:55 GMT
How many GM's here would actually even want to be on the Trade Committee? (except for Billy of course) I think our TC members do a great job. Sure, there are times when I might not necessarily agree with something but that is inevitable in a league like this. If it aint broke don't fix it, and I don't feel like it's broke. Just my 2 cents I feel like it could use a change. I'd do it. Billy would do it. Other capable GMs include yourself, Josh Barber (even though he's emeritus), James Kay, Shane Battier, Glenn Robinson. No disrespect to anybody I didn't name, that's just off the top of my head, I'm sure there's more. There's no shortage of capable and active GMs in this league.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 24, 2024 7:12:09 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2018 22:06:04 GMT
I'd like to submit my application:
|
|
|
Post by Jared Montini on Feb 16, 2018 22:57:11 GMT
I would like to do it if new gms are needed but I'm fine with the tc now
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Feb 17, 2018 6:11:32 GMT
I'll do it. I'm sure Charles would do it depending on how busy he is in his life. I feel I'm really in tune with the value of various players and picks. I would be in support of a rotational aspect of the TC. I'm sure there are some GMs who've been doing it who might be bored of it at this point anyways.
That said, there are always going to be disagreements. Shit me and Billy practically breath the same koolaid when it comes to prospects and players but when we disagree it's like a freaking Grand Canyon sized fissure. And that's how it is when people disagree in sports in general.
So what you're feeling now is not something that hasn't been felt by any team who's been denied a trade.
|
|
Chris Mullin
Golden State Warriors
Starter
Posts: 1,303
Feb 19, 2024 21:58:28 GMT
|
Post by Chris Mullin on Feb 17, 2018 6:54:45 GMT
For the record, I was genuinely just asking how many GM's would actually want to be on the TC.
I was on the TC in the original D5 (Utah Jazz) so I've had my fill of it, so I personally wouldn't be interested. If we do have some GM's that would like to be considered for a spot then it's definitely worth discussing some scenarios on how to possibly go about it if Ian was open to it.
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Feb 17, 2018 7:50:38 GMT
We can actually create a system that involves the TC rotation that will induce league activity.
Like this simple rules:
#1 Every season, we will have a rotation of TCs. #2 The first process is to rank the current TCs. (#1 for the best, #5 for the worst) The two lowest rank will be replace. #3 If the lowest get an average ranking 4 or higher value, he will need to forfeit one of his 2nd rounders. #4 The GM with the lowest amount of post counts in a 1-year period will get one of the vacated TC position. #5 The other position will be filled in another process. #6 The TC who has the highest average ranking will get a sort of reward.
I hope you can get the pinball effect of those six rules.
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Feb 17, 2018 16:04:43 GMT
We can actually create a system that involves the TC rotation that will induce league activity. Like this simple rules: #1 Every season, we will have a rotation of TCs. #2 The first process is to rank the current TCs. (#1 for the best, #5 for the worst) The two lowest rank will be replace. #3 If the lowest get an average ranking 4 or higher value, he will need to forfeit one of his 2nd rounders. #4 The GM with the lowest amount of post counts in a 1-year period will get one of the vacated TC position. #5 The other position will be filled in another process. #6 The TC who has the highest average ranking will get a sort of reward. I hope you can get the pinball effect of those six rules. I actually don't think this goes far enough. The 4th ranked TC member should have to sacrifice his first born child to Cthulhu and the 5th ranked member should be executed by crucifixion
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 24, 2024 7:12:09 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2018 16:44:44 GMT
Can I be in charge of ranking TC members?
|
|