|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Mar 21, 2019 9:39:44 GMT
Current Rating: 82 Suggested Rating: 78
This year:
13.5 ppg, 2.5 apg, 2.9 rpg, 0.9 spg, 0.4 bpg 42.5% FG 33.7% 3p
Compared to last year:
17.5 ppg, 2.9 apg, 2.6 rpg, 1.8 spg, 0.2 bpg 48.5% FG 39.6% 3p
He is a good defender, but his offensive game has completely tanked this year. We've put up a ton of increase threads on stat changes like this, so I think we've gotta put up decrease threads as well.
|
|
Tim Duncan
Former Jazz GM
Sophomore
Posts: 482
Mar 9, 2022 22:04:51 GMT
|
Post by Tim Duncan on Mar 21, 2019 10:01:52 GMT
He is also playing 6 min less this season though.
In his per 36 min stats there is a slight decrease in his numbers but its not enough to rate him a 78.
I am on mobile now cos cant post his per 36 min stats now
I think he should be an 80 due to his decreased efficiency
|
|
Tim Duncan
Former Jazz GM
Sophomore
Posts: 482
Mar 9, 2022 22:04:51 GMT
|
Post by Tim Duncan on Mar 21, 2019 10:09:48 GMT
2017-2018 per 36 min stats
18.3 ppg 2.7 rpg 3 apg 1.9 spg 0.2 bpg 1.9 tpg
2018-2019 per 36 min stats
17 ppg 3.7 rpg 3.1 apg 1.1 spg 0.5 bpg 1.5 tpg
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Mar 21, 2019 10:30:15 GMT
He is also playing 6 min less this season though. Yea cuz he's lost minutes to Malik Beasley, who is doing the same thing as Harris but doing so more efficiently
|
|
|
Post by George Gervin on Mar 21, 2019 11:36:00 GMT
78
|
|
|
Post by Jerry West on Mar 21, 2019 11:43:08 GMT
Injuries derailed this year for him and he has been playing less. Still a solid player, 80.
|
|
|
Post by Amare Stoudemire on Mar 21, 2019 11:43:23 GMT
79
|
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838
Dec 16, 2022 11:27:40 GMT
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Mar 21, 2019 13:51:10 GMT
He was hurt for a long ass time. Only really got back in to the starting lineup in the past month or so as they were easing him along. He hasn't been healthy since the start of the season with groin and hamstring injures and really hasn't been healthy until late February. I don't think he is an 82 for this season, but a 78 rating is a bad rating with all considered.
Voting an 82 only to average out the low votes of the 78 to an 80 - where I think he should be (granted both will be ignored most likely).
|
|
|
Post by Jared Montini on Mar 21, 2019 18:21:08 GMT
78.44
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Mar 22, 2019 1:19:52 GMT
Didn't realize how injury prone Harris was.
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Mar 22, 2019 2:19:04 GMT
79
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Mar 22, 2019 2:33:53 GMT
I'll go 80
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Mar 22, 2019 5:06:42 GMT
I’ll go 81. The /36 numbers swayed me, surprisingly
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Mar 23, 2019 1:46:29 GMT
Per 36 with the injury thing...I'm just not willing to make much of a move yet.
81 as well.
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Mar 23, 2019 8:10:00 GMT
Just to clarify, Harris has played 29 minutes per game in 45 games this season. It’s not exactly a small sample size like some people are making it out to be.
And even if you look at per36, you aren’t taking into account his huge dip in efficiency and FG%. I just don’t see how we rate someone averaging 13 ppg on 42% at any sort of 80+ rating.
|
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838
Dec 16, 2022 11:27:40 GMT
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Mar 23, 2019 12:59:02 GMT
Just to clarify, Harris has played 29 minutes per game in 45 games this season. It’s not exactly a small sample size like some people are making it out to be. And even if you look at per36, you aren’t taking into account his huge dip in efficiency and FG%. I just don’t see how we rate someone averaging 13 ppg on 42% at any sort of 80+ rating. Because he has been hurt for the entire year basically until late February/early March. I love CP3 and still think he is a top notch player but I couldn’t rate him with Westbrook and others. I rated him an 88 which is fair.
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Apr 10, 2019 7:07:22 GMT
Thread closed after 11 votes. New rating = 80
|
|