|
Post by Ian Noble on Nov 18, 2018 11:44:16 GMT
Current: 73 Proposed: 78
DeAaron's filling it up for the Kings this year, and the Kings don't even suck like usual.
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Nov 18, 2018 13:45:00 GMT
16 games......
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Nov 18, 2018 15:39:10 GMT
Yeah at least wait till our season starts lol. But yeah if he keeps this up 77-78 shouldn't be ridiculous.
|
|
|
Post by Jared Montini on Nov 18, 2018 17:30:03 GMT
Changing my vote to an 80 as well, he's playing out of his mind. Nice pick jay z
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Nov 18, 2018 21:19:01 GMT
I'd also agree that we should wait, but if we were going to vote, his current play is better than a 77 or 78. He's averaging 19 and 7 on 50% from the field and 42% from three
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Nov 24, 2018 14:41:21 GMT
I'm on board with waiting, on principal, until our season starts. THEN, Regular Stock Watch can open?
Before that, unless/until announced, the focus is on creating the rookies and catching up on the other players we need to create and/or update from the very end of last season.
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Dec 8, 2018 17:26:51 GMT
I liked Fox a lot as a prospect in the draft. It's good to see him take a big step step forward after a mediocre rookie season. He's currently playing at a mid 80s level right now, but he's obviously got to earn it over a longer period of time.
I'll go 80 for now.
|
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838
Dec 16, 2022 11:27:40 GMT
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Dec 8, 2018 17:55:46 GMT
Playing really well. 83
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Dec 8, 2018 18:03:38 GMT
He's been unreal so far, but I'm not convinced his shooting is real, he's was super bricky last season and only has 75 3pa this year. That said the rest of his game seems legit. One of the biggest year to year leaps I can remember
81
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Dec 8, 2018 22:30:25 GMT
I liked Fox a lot as a prospect in the draft. It's good to see him take a big step step forward after a mediocre rookie season. He's currently playing at a mid 80s level right now, but he's obviously got to earn it over a longer period of time. I'll go 80 for now. Mid 80's is a stretch lol. I'm voting 80 as well though.
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Dec 9, 2018 0:23:44 GMT
81
|
|
|
Post by George Gervin on Dec 9, 2018 2:14:08 GMT
80 for me— numbers have been really great so far, and he’s the clear leader on the Kings but his shooting is due for a regression just based on how absurd some of the percentages are
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Dec 9, 2018 4:41:21 GMT
Mid 80's is a stretch lol. I'm voting 80 as well though. If one of your players was putting up 17.8 ppg, 7.7 apg, 3.7 rpg on 47.3 FG%, 41.1 3P%, 70.3 FT% you wouldn't argue for a mid 80s rating? I would, that's a real nice stat line. Fox just has to prove he won't regress to his rookie level of performance for a little longer, but then that's easily worth an 83-85 imo.
|
|
|
Post by Kareem Abdul-Jabbar on Dec 9, 2018 15:12:44 GMT
79. ^^
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Dec 9, 2018 18:29:42 GMT
81.5
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Dec 11, 2018 13:54:22 GMT
Mid 80's is a stretch lol. I'm voting 80 as well though. If one of your players was putting up 17.8 ppg, 7.7 apg, 3.7 rpg on 47.3 FG%, 41.1 3P%, 70.3 FT% you wouldn't argue for a mid 80s rating? I would, that's a real nice stat line. Fox just has to prove he won't regress to his rookie level of performance for a little longer, but then that's easily worth an 83-85 imo. Donovan Mitchell had equal stats when you balance efficiency and defense and he got an 81.
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Dec 11, 2018 17:11:42 GMT
If one of your players was putting up 17.8 ppg, 7.7 apg, 3.7 rpg on 47.3 FG%, 41.1 3P%, 70.3 FT% you wouldn't argue for a mid 80s rating? I would, that's a real nice stat line. Fox just has to prove he won't regress to his rookie level of performance for a little longer, but then that's easily worth an 83-85 imo. Donovan Mitchell had equal stats when you balance efficiency and defense and he got an 81. Huh? Love Donovan but he’s never been as efficient as Fox is currently playing. Also never been the playmaker Fox is right now. And is Donovan a better defender? I thought Fox was... The question of whether Fox can maintain this is still up in the air, but he’s currently putting up better stats than Mitchell this season and last
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Dec 13, 2018 17:08:50 GMT
Donovan Mitchell had equal stats when you balance efficiency and defense and he got an 81. Huh? Love Donovan but he’s never been as efficient as Fox is currently playing. Also never been the playmaker Fox is right now. And is Donovan a better defender? I thought Fox was... The question of whether Fox can maintain this is still up in the air, but he’s currently putting up better stats than Mitchell this season and last I disagree with your assessment of his defense. And I think if he didn't have Rubio on the team would have had comparable stats.
|
|
|
Post by Chauncey Billups on Dec 13, 2018 21:32:17 GMT
82
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Dec 15, 2018 15:11:33 GMT
81. Needs to prove it a little longer to go higher.
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Dec 18, 2018 7:34:20 GMT
Thread closed after 12 votes. New rating = 81.
|
|