|
Post by Danny Longley on Dec 3, 2012 4:13:00 GMT
Not my guy but definitely deserving of a boost.
Current Rating: 73
Proposed Rating: 78-79
Key Stats:
2011-2012: 13.9 PPG | 7.4 RPG | 56.4% FG | .7 BPG | 2012-2013: 14.8 PPG | 7.6 RPG | 48.7% FG | 1.0 BPG |
He went under discussion in an earlier thread, so I'm not going to go too deep here.
Well. if he were on my roster, I'd be insulted that he's still at 73. 56.4% FG is nothing to sneeze at, and this season, his FG% should get back on track along with Love's. Also, he's literally rebounding with the best. Good FT% for a big, gets to the line at a decent rate as well.
Frankly, I'd just put him at a number close to where Asik is getting, but by increasing his offensive numbers as to where Asik should probably get a defensive boost.
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Dec 3, 2012 4:14:34 GMT
Agreed, definitely. Most of a season last year and a solid chunk of games this year has proven at least enough to get an increase.
I'd say 78 right now.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Mar 29, 2024 13:48:37 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 3, 2012 4:51:01 GMT
77, because he is not as good as Asik!
|
|
|
Post by Clyde Drexler on Dec 3, 2012 4:59:00 GMT
Rex, he's my guy and I rate him above Ibaka... Should be at least an 84...
Haha joking, I see him at a 78.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Mar 29, 2024 13:48:37 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2012 7:10:08 GMT
78
|
|
|
Post by Clyde Drexler on Jan 30, 2013 23:41:07 GMT
Update
16.0 PPG | 8.6 RPG | .511 FG% | .9 BPG
Any more input on Pek?
|
|
|
Post by Allen Iverson on Jan 31, 2013 3:01:52 GMT
78 for me.
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Jan 31, 2013 5:36:43 GMT
78 sounds good.
|
|
|
Post by Allen Iverson on May 1, 2013 6:32:00 GMT
Bump.
2011-2012 stats:
13.9 PPG, 7.4 RPG, .564 FG%, 26.9 MPG
2012-2013 stats:
16.3 PPG, 8.8 RPG, .520 FG %, 31.6 MPG
Proposed Rating: 82
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on May 1, 2013 23:38:55 GMT
I'll give him an 81-82. He had his breakout season last year and he backed it up this year, I think he's earned a rating above 80.
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on May 2, 2013 2:00:54 GMT
Yea, even though some injuries have shown up in his career so far, I think 81-82 sounds good for me as well.
|
|
|
Post by Danny Longley on May 2, 2013 4:05:52 GMT
I dunno, 79 still feels about right for me. In terms of big-men, 80 is just a completely different world IMO.
|
|
|
Post by Clyde Drexler on May 4, 2013 19:16:34 GMT
82 for me Wish I could have kept that beast
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jun 18, 2013 17:25:10 GMT
So, most that voted early re-voted, generally, the new ratings say he's an 81 or 82.
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Sept 15, 2013 16:39:53 GMT
77 78 78 79 81.5 81.5
82 82
80 for Pekovic.
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Sept 15, 2013 21:17:16 GMT
Ian, you are counting some people twice here aren't you?
Longley put in a "78-79" and then later said 79.
I put in 78 then later put in "81-82".
Vlade put in 77
Clyde put in 78 THEN put in 82. Jack put in 78 THEN put in 82. Alex put in 78 THEN put in 81-82.
So really, we have
77 79 81.5 81.5 82 82
Take out the 77 & 79 and the 82's and we have an 81.5
Rounding up, that's an 82.
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Sept 16, 2013 19:40:41 GMT
Hmm you might be right. I think you missed JR Wiles's 78 rating though.
SAC - 77 SAS - 78 DAL - 79 MIN - 81.5 DEN - 81.5
POR - 82 PHI - 82
Which is 80.6666etc.
so an 81.
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Sept 17, 2013 2:57:34 GMT
Hmm yea, not sure why but I did miss him.
|
|